From April 1st 2018 up to 1 million children could be denied a free school meal and the school they attend denied extra funding. The date might suggest it's a cruel joke, but it's just plain cruel.

What exactly is changing?

Currently, anyone claiming Universal Credit is eligible for free school meals. This is the 'transitional arrangement' set up by the government as Universal Credit is rolled out across the country.
Anyone who claimed Universal Credit before 1st April will remain eligible for free school meals.
The problem arises for people who claim Universal Credit on or after 1st April 2018. For these families, often hard-working families in paid employment the Tories claim to represent, only those earning less that £7,400 (before any benefits they are claiming are added) will be eligible. 

What's the problem?

It punishes work that pays just over the threshold.

It produces a dangerous cliff-edge, where earning a penny over the £7,400 threshold will mean a family has to find around £430 a year to pay for school meals for each child in junior or secondary school (all infant school aged children in state schools receive free school meals, regardless of parental income). I’ve been that parent, the person doing multiple online benefit calculations to work out if I’d be financially better or worse off from taking a different job or more hours. It’s not a happy place.

It’s not fair that rules are different in Northern Ireland.

For families in Northern Ireland the threshold is £14,000 rather than £7,400. I’ve not yet heard a justification for that difference. In fact, one of the DUP MP’s Jim Shannon had signed an early day motion attacking the the cuts planned for England and then backed the Tories in voting through the changes! Eurgh, doesn’t the hypocrisy make you sick? This difference in rules is what has led to the headlines accusing the Tories of buying the votes of the DUP; the ten MPs who maintain their wafer thin majority.

It reduces funding to schools.

Fewer children entitled to free school meals means reduced school funding. Schools receive a 'pupil premium' for any child that is eligible for free school meals, and crucially whose parents have claimed for free school meals (whether or not the child wants the school meal, it is the process of actually claiming and proving entitlement that unlocks this pupil premium funding). This funding is worth between £935 - £1,320 (£2,300 for looked after children and an additional £300 for service children).

Why are the Tories accusing Labour of scaremongering?

They’re a bit confused. The Tories are claiming that no free school meals or the pupil premium school funding that comes with it will be taken away from children already entitled to and receiving it. That’s true - the problem is not that meals are being taken from families that have already claimed - but that families who claim after 1st April 2018 will be treated differently. It’s not that difficult to understand is it? Let me be clear:
  • Anyone who makes a claim for Universal Credit before 1st April 2018 is entitled to free school meals.
  • Anyone who makes a claim for Universal Credit after 1st April 2018 is only entitled to free school meals if they earn less than £7,400.

Why are the Tories claiming 50,000 more children will be entitled to free school meals?

The Tories would like us to believe that they’re being really lovely. Let’s jump back to before Universal Credit, and to those still currently claiming the old benefits where Universal Credit has not yet been fully rolled out. Under the old benefits system anyone earning over £6,240 would not be eligible for free school meals. This has now increased to £7,400 - which is where the Tories get their figure of 50,000 more children being eligible by 2022. 
Don’t be fooled by this claim. Think about how you would have voted…

Option A: Keep the 'transitional arrangement’ so that all children of families claiming Universal Credit are eligible for free school meals, their school entitled to additional pupil premium funding, and parents free to take more hours without fear of being worse off.

Option B: Abandon the ‘transitional arrangement’ and the chance to help a million children and their families, but slightly increase the threshold so that just 50,000 more children will be entitled to free school meals.

Don’t let the Tories fool you. It is Labour who want to ensure all children at risk of poverty have a hot meal every school day. It is Labour who want to give parents the confidence to accept work without having to worry if they’ll be worse off. It is Labour who have clear policies on their side without the need to buy votes from the DUP. It is Labour are working for the many, not the few.

What now?

Does it make you angry that our MP John Penrose, voted to deny children a hot meal? Does it make you angry that he voted for schools to receive less funding? Does it make you angry he has made it harder for parents to find work without fear of the consequences? Does it make you angry families here are treated differently to those in Northern Ireland because his party has to buy votes from the DUP? 


Don't let him and his party get away with it. Write to him, email him, tweet him, get on facebook and tell him what you think. If you're reading this from outside of Weston-super-Mare you can find out who your MP is here and check how they voted here.


And most importantly sign the petition and join us to ensure they don't get away with it for much longer by delivering leaflets, canvassing or coming along to meetings with your ideas and enthusiasm.

Link to Instagram Link to Twitter Link to YouTube Link to Facebook Link to LinkedIn Link to Snapchat Close Fax Website Location Phone Email Calendar Building Search